Stem cell treatment for acute myocardial infarction
- David M Clifford2,
- Sheila A Fisher3,
- Susan J Brunskill3,
- Carolyn Doree3,
- Anthony Mathur4,
- Suzanne Watt5,
- Enca Martin-Rendon1,*
Editorial Group:
Cochrane Heart Group
Published Online: 15 FEB 2012
Assessed as up-to-date: 23 JUL 2011
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006536.pub3
Copyright © 2012 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Background
Stem cell therapy
offers a promising approach to the regeneration of damaged vascular and
cardiac tissue after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This has
resulted in multiple randomised controlled trials (RCTs) worldwide.
Objectives
To
critically evaluate evidence from RCTs on the effectiveness of adult
bone marrow-derived stem cells (BMSC) to treat acute myocardial
infarction (AMI).
Search methods
This
Cochrane review is an update of a previous one (published in 2008).
MEDLINE (1950 to January 2011), EMBASE (1974 to January 2011), the
Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (Issue 1,
2011), CINAHL (1982 to January 2011) and the Transfusion Evidence
Library (1980 to January 2011) were searched. In addition, several
international and ongoing trial databases were searched and
handsearching of relevant conference proceedings undertaken to January
2011.
Selection criteria
RCTs
comparing autologous stem/progenitor cells with no autologous
stem/progenitor cells in patients diagnosed with AMI were eligible.
Data collection and analysis
Two
authors independently screened all references, assessed trial quality
and extracted data. Meta-analyses using a random-effects model were
conducted and heterogeneity was explored for the primary outcome using
sub-group analyses.
Main results
Thirty-three
RCTs (1765 participants) were eligible for inclusion. Stem/progenitor
cell treatment was not associated with statistically significant changes
in the incidence of mortality (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.40 to 1.21) or
morbidity (the latter measured by re-infarction, hospital re-admission,
restenosis and target vessel revascularisation). A considerably high
degree of heterogeneity has been observed among the included trials. In
short-term follow up, stem cell treatment was observed to improve left
ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) significantly (WMD 2.87, 95% CI
2.00 to 3.73). This improvement in LVEF was maintained over long-term
follow up of 12 to 61 months (WMD 3.75, 95% CI 2.57 to 4.93). With
certain measurements and at certain times, stem cell treatment was
observed to reduce left ventricular end systolic and end diastolic
volumes (LVESV & LVEDV) and infarct size significantly in long-term
follow up. There was a positive correlation between mononuclear cell
dose infused and the effect on LVEF measured by magnetic resonance
imaging. A correlation between timing of stem cell treatment and effect
on LVEF measured by left ventricular angiography was also observed.
Authors' conclusions
Despite
the high degree of heterogeneity observed, the results of this
systematic review suggest that moderate improvement in global heart
function is significant and sustained long-term. However, because
mortality rates after successful revascularization of the culprit
arteries are very low, larger number of participants would be required
to assess the full clinical effect of this treatment. Standardisation of
methodology, cell dosing and cell product formulation, timing of cell
transplantation and patient selection may also be required in order to
reduce the substantial heterogeneity observed among the included
studies.
Plain language summary
Stem cell treatment following a heart attack
Currently
the standard treatment for people suffering a heart attack (due to a
blockage in the artery supplying blood to the heart) is to directly open
the artery with a tiny balloon in a procedure called primary
angioplasty and to introduce a small tube into the artery to keep it
open called a stent. The use of primary angioplasty and stents to reopen
the blocked artery can lead to a 33% reduction in the mortality (death
rate) associated with this condition. Recently, bone marrow
stem/progenitor cells have been investigated as a new treatment that may
prevent the damage to heart muscle caused by a heart attack in addition
to the treatment offered by primary angioplasty. Analysis of randomised
controlled trials to 2011 indicates that this new treatment may lead to
some improvements over standard treatment as measured by tests of heart
function in the short and long term. Over 1,700 patients have
participated so far in the 33 trials included in this systematic review.
ليست هناك تعليقات:
إرسال تعليق